ASL LAW analysis of Asia-Pacific global tax policy developments

New Developments in Global Tax Policy in Asia-Pacific: Impacts and Emerging Trends

As the global economy becomes increasingly integrated, tax policy—traditionally a pillar of national sovereignty—is now heavily influenced by international initiatives and regional dynamics. Recent changes in the international tax framework demand not only technical adjustments but also exert pressure on the adaptability of cross-border enterprises.

Businesses operating in areas affected by changes in tax policies should consider contacting reputable law firms specializing in tax law consultation to receive support on a case-by-case basis.

Global Minimum Tax: A New Coordination Mechanism in a Multilateral Environment

One of the most pivotal shifts is the implementation of the OECD’s global minimum tax pillars. Two key instruments—the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) and the Undertaxed Profits Rule (UTPR)—are reshaping how tax liabilities are allocated among jurisdictions.

Under the IIR, the jurisdiction where the ultimate parent entity is located can impose a top-up tax if the effective tax rate on foreign income falls below the agreed minimum. Meanwhile, the UTPR redistributes additional tax liabilities based on a country’s share of tangible assets and personnel—meaning that countries with lower tax rates, such as Vietnam, may be more heavily affected than higher-tax jurisdictions like Japan or Singapore.

Australia: Tightening Oversight on Foreign Investors and Capital Structures

Australia is rolling out a suite of reforms aimed at broadening the taxable income base of non-residents, especially concerning profits derived from land use rights, resources, and infrastructure. The country has revised the definition of principal assets and now requires mandatory disclosure of large-scale transactions exceeding AUD 20 million to the Australian Taxation Office.

Of note, interest deduction limitations have been tightened to curb tax base erosion through financial structuring. Deductions are now capped at 30% of EBITDA, with unused deductions permitted to be carried forward for up to 15 years.

Indonesia: Comprehensive Transfer Pricing Reform and Anti-Avoidance Measures

Indonesia has issued consolidated rules on transfer pricing, advance pricing agreements (APAs), and dispute resolution mechanisms. A notable shift is the recognition of transfer pricing adjustments as deemed dividends—allowing the government to tax retained earnings even in the absence of formal dividend declarations.

Recent case law illustrates a trend toward stricter assessment of related-party profits, especially in disputes involving royalty payments and intangible asset usage. Additionally, seven new anti-avoidance rules introduced under Law No. 7/2021 establish a substance-over-form framework and target indirect transactions routed through third parties.

Thailand: Monitoring Foreign-Sourced Income, Retained Profits, and VAT Fraud

From early 2024, Thai tax residents are required to declare and pay personal income tax on foreign-sourced income remitted into Thailand within the same year. However, to encourage capital repatriation, the government has proposed a two-year tax exemption window for such income from the date it arises.

Thailand is also grappling with tensions between corporate law and withholding tax obligations related to retained earnings, particularly in intra-group lending or asset purchases—areas that pose high risks of being classified as disguised dividend distributions.

Meanwhile, VAT fraud involving fictitious invoice trading among intermediaries has become a serious issue. Penalties of up to 200% and interest fines of 1.5% per month underscore the urgency of enhancing real-time monitoring systems and strengthening due diligence obligations in transactions.

Developed Economies: Implementation Progress and Complex Spillover Effects

In Japan, the IIR has been in effect since April 2024, with UTPR and the Qualified Domestic Minimum Top-Up Tax (QDMTT) expected to follow in 2026. With a high corporate tax rate of 30%, Japan stands to benefit by taxing additional profits of subsidiaries in low-tax jurisdictions.

In contrast, the United States has yet to formally implement Pillar Two domestically. Nevertheless, U.S. multinationals are still affected by foreign rules aligned with the OECD framework. This is especially concerning given that the effective U.S. tax rate could drop to as low as 5% due to tax credits—triggering the risk of top-up taxation overseas.

Singapore, known for its attractive tax regime in the region, has announced that both the IIR and QDMTT will be implemented starting 1 January 2025. This marks a transition from an effective tax rate of around 10% in some cases to the global minimum of 15%, signaling a strategic pivot to retain competitiveness while aligning with international standards.

The document also highlights the coordinating role of the G7 in setting global tax norms. However, variations in timing and approaches among jurisdictions have created a complex “matrix” of overlapping opportunities and challenges. Each country is now carefully weighing the balance between safeguarding tax revenue and maintaining foreign investment appeal—guided by domestic capacity and medium-term economic priorities.

Conclusion: Synchronized Shifts and the Imperative of Strategic Adaptation

From the adoption of a global minimum tax to region-specific reforms, the tax landscape is evolving toward greater transparency, complexity, and interconnection. Cross-border businesses can no longer treat taxation as a purely domestic issue—they must proactively develop compliance strategies, conduct risk assessments, and remain updated on emerging trends.

Doing so will not only help them capitalize on potential incentives but also avoid costly disputes and regulatory pitfalls in an increasingly harmonized global tax environment.

ASL Law is a leading full-service and independent Vietnamese law firm made up of experienced and talented lawyers. ASL Law is ranked as the top tier Law Firm in Vietnam by Legal500, Asia Law, WTR, and Asia Business Law Journal. Based in both Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam, the firm’s main purpose is to provide the most practical, efficient and lawful advice to its domestic and international clients. If we can be of assistance, please email to [email protected].

ASL LAW is the top-tier Vietnam law firm for tax law consulting service. If you need any advice, please contact us for further information or collaboration.

***Other service of ASL LAW – full service Vietnam law firm *** 
Retainer service to enterprisesInternational trademark registration
Oversea investment consultancy for Vietnamese enterprisesPatent in Vietnam
PCT Patent in VietnamPCT Patent Vietnam Entry
Intellectual property services (Vietnam IP Firm)Vietnam Patent Agent
Trademark in VietnamVietnam Patent Firm
Vietnam Trademark AgentPatent translation in Vietnam
How to register trademark in VietnamVietnam Patent Translation Agent
Copyright in VietnamVietnam IP Firm
Vietnam TrademarkVietnam IP Agent
Notes to company formation in VietnamM&A
How to open company in VietnamBanking & financial services
Open representative office in VietnamContract consultancy
Establish company in VietnamEmployment and labor
Corporate services in VietnamLitigation and dispute resolution
Vietnam Law FirmFranchise in Vietnam
Vietnam Antidumping Law FirmVietnam Franchise registration
Vietnam countervailing law firmVietnam Business Law Firm
Vietnam Real estate law firmVietnam construction law firm
Law firm in HanoiLaw Firm in Ho Chi Minh

Contact Me on Zalo
+84982682122
WhatsApp chat