criteria for evaluating market economy status by the United States, criteria for evaluating market economy status, evaluating market economy status of the United States, the United States's criteria for evaluating market economy status ,

Criteria for evaluating market economy status by the United States

Currently, the United States Department of Commerce is considering recognizing 11 countries as market economies, including Belarus, Georgia, Kyrgyzstan, China, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Moldova, Tajikistan, Uzbekistan, Vietnam, and Turkmenistan. Understanding the method by which the United States confirms market economy status would be beneficial for Vietnam, providing a basis for the country to make necessary changes corresponding to the recognition criteria of the United States.

Some countries have transitioned from non-market economies to market economies in recent years, including Poland (1993), Russia (2002), and Ukraine (2006).

For a country to be considered a market economy, its government must formally request the United States or receive support from the petitioner in the US anti-dumping investigation that the country has a market economy. The Department of Commerce must conduct an investigation and consider six main factors:

  1. The extent of the country’s currency conversion.
  2. The degree of freedom in determining wages through negotiation.
  3. The ability for foreign companies to form joint ventures or invest.
  4. Government control over production materials.
  5. Government control over resource allocation and decisions regarding prices and output of enterprises.
  6. Other factors deemed appropriate by the managing authority.

Additionally, the Department of Commerce may determine that certain industries operate under market conditions while still applying the non-market economy evaluation method to other industries.

The last time the US Department of Commerce assessed the status of an economy with significant similarities to Vietnam, China, was in October 2017. The Department of Commerce concluded that China remains a non-market economy due to “the role of the state in the economy and the state’s relationship with the market and private sector leading to fundamental distortions in the Chinese economy.” Therefore, the Department of Commerce continues not to use prices and costs in China to analyze anti-dumping behavior.

The World Trade Organization’s Anti-Dumping Agreement (ADA) requires member countries to use cost and price data verified by investigated companies to calculate margins and anti-dumping duties.

However, the ADA also allows member countries to use alternative methods, including using substitute data from third countries in specific cases. Some countries, particularly the United States, have applied this method to investigated companies from non-market economies such as China. This has resulted in higher anti-dumping duties on imports from China compared to other countries considered to have market economies.

Under US law, a non-market economy can be any foreign country that the US Department of Commerce deems not to “operate on market principles regarding cost or prices, causing the sale of goods in that country not to reflect the fair value of the goods.”

Evaluating non-market economies is crucial because using a substitute country to construct the “normal value” of products in an anti-dumping investigation often leads to applying higher anti-dumping duties than would occur using price and cost data from the investigated producer/exporter. In anti-dumping investigations of non-market economies, the Department of Commerce assumes that there is no market mechanism to determine prices and costs for the investigated products and applies a nationwide anti-dumping duty to all imported goods except for companies that can demonstrate that they operate without government control both in fact and in law (they may receive a separate anti-dumping duty).

For the nationwide anti-dumping duty, the Department of Commerce will identify the market economy closest to the non-market economy under review based on the World Bank’s assessments of gross national income at purchasing power parity.

ASL Law is a leading full-service and independent Vietnamese law firm made up of experienced and talented lawyers. ASL Law is ranked as the top tier Law Firm in Vietnam by Legal500, Asia Law, WTR, and Asia Business Law Journal. Based in both Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City in Vietnam, the firm’s main purpose is to provide the most practical, efficient and lawful advice to its domestic and international clients. If we can be of assistance, please email to info@aslgate.com.

ASL LAW is the top-tier Vietnam law firm for Anti-dumping & countervailing. If you need any advice, please contact us for further information or collaboration.

***Other service of ASL LAW – full service Vietnam law firm ***
Retainer service to enterprises International trademark registration
Oversea investment consultancy for Vietnamese enterprisesPatent in Vietnam
PCT Patent in Vietnam PCT Patent Vietnam Entry
Intellectual property services (Vietnam IP Firm) Vietnam Patent Agent
Trademark in Vietnam Vietnam Patent Firm
Vietnam Trademark Agent Patent translation in Vietnam
How to register trademark in Vietnam Vietnam Patent Translation Agent
Copyright in Vietnam Vietnam IP Firm
Vietnam Trademark Vietnam IP Agent
Notes to company formation in VietnamM&A
How to open company in VietnamBanking & financial services
Open representative office in VietnamContract consultancy
Establish company in VietnamEmployment and labor
Corporate services in VietnamLitigation and dispute resolution
Vietnam Law FirmFranchise in Vietnam
Vietnam Antidumping Law Firm Vietnam Franchise registration
Vietnam countervailing law firm Vietnam Business Law Firm
Vietnam Real estate law firm Vietnam construction law firm
Law firm in Hanoi Law Firm in Ho Chi Minh
Contact Me on Zalo
+84982682122
WhatsApp chat